Monday, January 16, 2017

ARCHIVE PROJECT VERITAS: Oct. 17 - Nov. 29, 2016

Live Blog

Jan. 16, 2018


Some tweeps have been posing the legal question, what about the protection of teens and minors. A third of teens from the age of 13 are on Twitter according to Pew and 42% of 15-17 year olds. In another study from the University of Utah, 41% of teen boys and 30% of girls are reported to be receiving “sexts” online. Pedophilia is referring to prepubescent children, but we're still talking about minors. Both are federal offenses and keeping nude picture of minors on servers is illegal. No reaction about that from Twitter today.

Jan. 15, 2018


Jan. 15, 2018 Hundreds of Twitter Employees view "Everything you post," including private "sex messages".

Project Veritas has released undercover footage of Twitter Engineers and employees admitting that Twitter employees view "everything you post" on their servers, including private "sex messages," and "d*ck pics." The engineers also admit that Twitter analyzes this information to create a "virtual profile" of you which they sell to advertisers. This video is so egregious, @jack will have to address it.

James O’Keefe has just completed a book about this series entitled "AMERICAN PRAVDA: My fight for Truth in the Era of Fake News." The book will be released by St. Martin’s Press on January 16, 2018. Pre-order the book:


Conservatives and Christians have long suspected that Twitter works aggressively behind the scenes to censor their material. That suspicion has now been confirmed in an undercover investigation involving numerous Twitter employees who let slip what really happens behind the scenes of the mega social media platform. A Project Veritas (PV) report released this week zeroes in on Twitter's little-known practice of “shadow banning,” which turns out to be a rather surreptitious, stealth method of censorship. (More)

Are you being shadow banned? The @WillianLegate trick is not reliable! (More) (article) Try this:
Post a tweet with a hashtag. Wait a few minutes. Find the hashtag, click tab Latest. If you're not shadow banned yr tweet should be there. 


O’Keefe’s 2nd undercover video shows Twitter engineers bragging about how they target pro-Trump accounts by banning them or hiding their content. (...) Twitter denied ‘shadowbanning accounts, however; they did admit to taking action to ‘downrank’ accounts they deem abusive. So who decides what is abusive? Aren’t abusive users removed from the site altogether? (More)

Jan. 11, 2018


Jan. 11, 2018 Twitter Engineers To "Ban a Way of Talking" Through "Shadow Banning".

In the latest undercover Project Veritas video investigation, current and former Twitter employees are on camera explaining steps the social media giant is taking to censor political content that they don’t like.

  • Steven Pierre, Twitter engineer explains “shadow banning,” says “it’s going to ban a way of talking”
  • Former Twitter software engineer Abhinav Vadrevu on shadow banning: “they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it”
  • Former Twitter Content Review Agent Mo Norai explains banning process: “if it was a pro-Trump thing and I’m anti-Trump… I banned his whole account… it’s at your discretion”
  • When asked if banning process was an unwritten rule, Norai adds “Very. A lot of unwritten rules… It was never written it was more said”
  • Olinda Hassan, Policy Manager for Twitter Trust and Safety explains, “we’re trying to ‘down rank’… shitty people to not show up,” “we’re working [that] on right now”
  • “Shadow banning” to be used to stealthily target political views- former Twitter engineer says, “that’s a thing”
  • Censorship of certain political viewpoints to be automated via “machine learning” according to Twitter software engineer
  • Parnay Singh, Twitter Direct Messaging Engineer, on machine learning algorithms, “you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck…” “the majority of it are for Republicans”  (More

⏩ Twitter has distanced itself from comments by an employee about providing the Justice Department with President Trump's tweets and direct messages which were caught on video and published by Project Veritas. “The individual depicted in this video was speaking in a personal capacity and does not represent or speak for Twitter,” Twitter told International Business Times. “Twitter only responds to valid legal requests, and does not share any user information with law enforcement without such a request.” “We deplore the deceptive and underhanded tactics by which this footage was obtained and selectively edited to fit a pre-determined narrative,” Twitter’s spokesperson said. “Twitter is committed to enforcing our rules without bias and empowering every voice on our platform, in accordance with the Twitter Rules.” (More)

Jan. 10, 2018


Jan. 10, 2018 Twitter Sr Network Security Engineer reveals @TwitterGov ready to give Trump's private DMs to Special Counsel Mueller without subpoena. 

A Project Veritas undercover investigation has revealed a senior network security engineer at Twitter stating that his company is “more than happy” to turn over the private communications and deleted tweets of President Donald Trump to the Department of Justice. If true, it is yet unknown whether Twitter is voluntarily disclosing this sensitive information or acting under a court order. Twitter is currently in the midst of defending itself from left-leaning criticism that President Trump hasn’t been removed from the enormous media platform for violations of Twitter’s Terms of Service.

  • Undercover Video of Twitter Engineer Clay Haynes Saying “We’re more than happy to help the DOJ with their little investigation” 
  • Content Disclosed to DOJ Includes: “Even the ones he’s deleted, any direct messages”
  • Engineer is Self-Proclaimed “Bleeding-Heart Liberal” Stating “It comes with the territory [at Twitter]”
  • Goes on to Explain Additional “Big Brotherish” Practices at Twitter (More)

Nov. 29, 2017


Triple sting at WaPo and Project Veritas. After O"Keefe posted his first video inside Wapo, Wapo breaks their counter operation. A woman, working under cover for Veritas, told WaPo that she had been sexually abused as a teenager by Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore as part of a coordinated effort "to embarrass the paper, the Post reported Monday". (...) Not so much embarrass them as outing WaPo for their unethical practices. WaPo caught her as they found a page (More
Washington Post reporter Aaron Davis attempts to ambush the group’s imminent video release on the paper. “The @washingtonpost attempts to ambush @Project_Veritas anticipating an imminent video release…,” tweeted O’Keefe. The footage shows Davis following O’Keefe at an undisclosed location. At the start of the clip, Davis appears to be asking O’Keefe about what the group is filming. O’Keefe notes Davis is using the same “techniques,” as Project Veritas and asks if the reporter has been inspired by the guerrilla journalism organization. “Uh…No,” replies a seemingly unsure Davis. The clip then shows a muted conversation between Davis and O’Keefe. “I think it’s really cute you guys are borrowing our techniques,” jokes O’Keefe. Text reading “They’re worried we have a story on them…We do,” appears at the end of the video. (Source)


Nov. 4, 2016


In December, 2010, US Department of State IT Systems Administrator Cindy Almodovar reported that she met with Huma Abedin for thirty minutes regarding emails at the then unknown, but now notorious, site. Here’s is the text from that email exchange:

Nov. 2, 2016


Wayne Dupree is on the case.


Oct 26, 2016 Video V: Democratic Pollster Celinda Lake Tells Union Workers To Lie To Voters.

In the latest video released by conservative activist group Project Veritas, Teamsters Legislative Representative Michael Dolan, clearly admits his group lies to union workers about candidates in order to help get them elected. And Democratic pollster Celinda Lake encourages union workers to lie to voters on specific issues because the Democrats are behind the Republicans at the moment and are "in trouble." Lake was a general consultant for Bill Clinton and has since worked with the DNC, AFL-CIO, Planned Parenthood, Joe Biden, and Nancy Pelosi. (More)

Oct.  27, 2016


The Project Veritas videos are often dismissed as made by "a convicted fellon" referring to the spots of trouble O'Keefe inevitably encountered on his quests to disclose corruption, fraud, and other misconduct in public and private institutions. But the real "convicted fellon" in this story is Robert Creamer, a seasoned operative for the Democrat Party, specializing in the dark arts of provocation, agitation and Chicago dirty tricks. Here's the story.

Democratic operative Robert Creamer participated in daily calls with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and worked directly with President Barack Obama to organize “issue campaigns.” (...) O’Keefe also reports that Creamer accepted a foreign donation for a Democratic super PAC. (...) In the video, Creamer explains to a Project Veritas journalist that he works for the Clinton campaign and is in charge of “overseeing” activities at the Trump rallies (...) Last week, O’Keefe showed how Creamer and his Democracy Partners firm have been using a technique called “bird-dogging” to incite violence at Trump rallies and other Republican events for more than a year.

Later last week, Hillary Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook denied working with Creamer. On Monday, O’Keefe and Project Veritas released a video showing Creamer claiming that Hillary Clinton had personally approved one of his stunts, involving an activist dressing up as Donald Duck and trying to provoke Trump supporters. In the new video, Creamer goes even further, saying: “Every morning I am on a call at 10:30 that goes over the message being driven by the campaign headquarters … I am in this campaign mainly to deal with what earned media, with television, radio, with earned media and social media, not with paid media, not with advertising.” (...)

Creamer, a seasoned Chicago activist, also talks about his work with Barack Obama, whom he says he has known since the 1980s, when Obama was a community organizer in Chicago: “He’s a pro, I’ve known the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.” Elsewhere, Creamer adds: “I do a lot of work with the White House on their issues, helping to run issue campaigns that they have been involved in. I mean, for immigration reform for the… the health care bill, for trying to make America more like Britain when it comes to gun violence issues.” Creamer is married to Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), whose Republican opponent, Joan McCarthy Lasonde, has called for her to resign over her husband’s activities. (Source)

(...)  Creamer wrote 628 pages of Obamacare while he was in prison, having been convicted of 16 counts involving bank fraud (and of course income tax fraud – the Mother’s Milk of Democrats.) (...) Creamer served 5 months in prison and an additional 11 months under house arrest. (...)  Creamer’s hate-filled attack on America called “Stand Up Straight!” [his tactical handbook, scroll down to Oct. 22 for more: ed.] calls for the “democratization of wealth” in America, “progressive control of governments around the world,” and of course amnesty for illegal aliens. It assures Democrats they could win a permanent majority in Congress by:
passing a national health care bill, thereby turning more people into wards of an ever-expanding government, and of the party that works to grow government; and giving amnesty to all illegal immigrants, thereby creating, virtually overnight, a large new constituency of Democratic voters. 
He counseled Democrats that to win complete control of America, they must “not just generate understanding, but emotion—fear, revulsion, anger, disgust.” He added, “If the Democrats continue to stand firmly for immigrant rights, the issue will define immigrants’ voting loyalties for a generation. If we are successful, a gigantic block of progressive votes will enter the electorate over the next 15 years—a block that could be decisive in the battle for the future.” (Source)

Oct. 26, 2016


Oct 26, 2016 Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned.

In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamer’s effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did. In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFC’s activities. He told a journalist that AUFC was going to return the twenty thousand dollars. He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadn’t been a problem for the month that they had the money.

Oct. 24, 2016


Oct 24, 2016 Video III: Clinton implicated in violating federal campaign laws.

UPDATE: Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.” The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.

Oct. 23, 2016


James O’Keefe has confirmed that part 3 will be released Monday or Tuesday and that Hillary and Donna Brazile will be implicated. In the meantime HuffPo has posted a first defense of DNC operative Robert Creamer who wrote a tactical Alinkskyite handbook entitled Stand Up Straight from his prison cell. He visited the White House 300+ times and met with the Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama over 40 times. It has now also transpired that Creamer is more than your ordinary felon, agitator and Democrat operative. He is the author of Obamacare. (More) The apologetics in HuffPo are constructed out of the usual Leftwing fallacies: blaming the messenger, delegit the evidence with irrelevant arguments as for example that Donald Trump financially supported Project Veritas. Read HuffPo how the provocateur calls his accuser a... provocateur. He's resigned (temporarily of course) but the revelations are "total bullshit".
Bob Creamer stepped away from his job after the films were made public. But he maintains the whole thing is “total bulls**t.” calling for the release of the full, unedited tape. Bob Creamer, a longtime Democratic operative who works closely with the Democratic National Committee, says he is the victim of an elaborate and deceptive smear campaign by the well-known conservative provocateur James O’Keefe (...) Creamer said O’Keefe’s tapes make a misleading case, and that if the full footage were made public, those deceptions would be evident (...) Our firm and a number of others have been victims of a substantial, monthslong spying operation run by James O’Keefe that was pretty sophisticated.” (...) Trump, in fact, gave O’Keefe’s outfit $10,000 through his Trump Foundation, while the CEO of his campaign, Steve Bannon, regularly featured O’Keefe’s work when he was executive director of Breitbart. (...) (More)

Elsewhere on rigging the elections

Oct. 22, 2016


Red alert yesterday from James O'Keefe yesterday. The release of part 3 of his film Rigging the Election was scheduled for next Monday. There's now a dead man's switch attached to it, in custody of Alex Jones. 


On the subject of Robert Creamer,  from prison he wrote a tactical handbook entitled Stand Up Straight. The goal of his strategy is to demoralize Conservatives, to make them feel isolated, create infighting. This is the guy from O'Keefe's first video who visited the White House 300+ times and met with the Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama over 40 times. The media amplify Creamer's classic Marxist and Alinskyite narrative. Let's not forget: Obama gave master classes in this technique and Hillary wrote a thesis on Alinsky tactics. 

Oct. 20, 2016


Folks, remember way back when, when gangster states that didn't meet our high moral standards called their freedom fighters terrorists and criminals? Well, here it is. We reached the point ourselves now that information that reveals the violations against liberty is called "illegal" and whistle blowers are dismissed as criminals! Those without a properly functioning moral compass are quite confused.

Oct. 19, 2016


Democrats, media and other opponents have quickly found a way to ignore the revelations made by O'Keefe and his Project Veritas. In 2013 O’Keefe reached a legal agreement to pay that $100,000 to Juan Carlos Vera, who in 2009 worked for the community organizing group ACORN. O’Keefe and his partner Hannah Giles taped an interview with Vera in his office which O’Keefe used in his ongoing campaign against the group. That was against California law. (Source) It has nothing to do with "editing issues". The idea that the relevations made in "Rigging the Elections" can now be ignored because O'Keefe is a "convicted criminal" is quite typical for the moral gutter mentality of the media and the Democrat party in particular. They perpetually confuse the law with ethics and basic logic. In the meantime proof is emerging that this vote rigging goes all the way to the top of the Democrat Party. 

In the meantime "It appears that the woman from Okeefe's video who states on camera that she was one of the people who shut down Trump's Chicago rally was directly paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign. FEC records are a bitch, Hillary -- there's a payroll and phone record in there that appears to be for this same woman and her name is unique enough that I'm willing to bet there's only one of her. This appears to be clear federal documentary evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign paid "protesters" less than two weeks before they engaged in a violent demonstration that not only obstructed Trump's rally it resulted in both property damage and personal injury to police officers.

Oct. 18, 2016


Oct 18, 2016 Video 2: The Democrats and mass voter fraud. 

In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.


The mainstream media are not going the give O'Keefe the time of day. FoxNews -- the network that only just got round to putting a team on the PodestaEmails (which is good news in itself) -- canceled an interview with O'Keefe. Hannity did air the mindblowing revelation. 

On another note: 

Oct. 17, 2016


Oct 17, 2016 Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC incite violence at Trump Rallies.

In this explosive new video from Project Veritas, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging. Democrats have used trained provocateurs to instigate violence at Republican events nationwide throughout the 2016 election cycle, including at several Donald Trump rallies, using a tactic called “bird-dogging,” according to a new video investigation released Monday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas. The goal of “bird-dogging”: to create a sense of “anarchy” around Donald Trump that would undermine his political support. Often, the tactic uses the most vulnerable people — including the elderly and disabled — to maximize shock value.

O’Keefe’s extensive video investigation reveals that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) are involved in “bird-dogging” and other provocative tactics through a web of consultants led by Robert Creamer, a veteran Chicago activist and convicted felon who is thought to have planned Democrats’ political strategy during the push for Obamacare in 2009 and 2010. Creamer is also the co-founder of Democracy Partners, a consulting group that, according to Project Veritas videos, apparently contracts directly with the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, and that works with an array of super PACs and consultants to organize, film and publicize their provocations. Creamer affirms on one video that Clinton is aware of “all” of his work, and that Democracy Partners has a daily telephone call with the Clinton campaign to coordinate efforts.

 O’Keefe and his team also obtained hidden camera videos showing one of Creamer’s consultants, Scott Foval, describing “bird-dogging,” among other tactics, and taking credit for having instigated violence at several Republican events during the 2016 election cycle. Foval — who praises Creamer as “diabolical” — explains how “bird-dogging” works: how they plan confrontations in advance, choose particular individuals to provoke, and maximize media coverage. Foval also tells Project Veritas’s undercover journalist that Republicans are less adept at such tactics because they obey rules: “They have fewer guys willing to step out on the line for what they believe in. … There is a level of adherence to rules on the other side that only when you’re at the very highest level, do you get over.” (More)