Sunday, September 3, 2017

(AUDIO) WHO EXONERATED HILLARY IN EMAIL 'MATTER'

The FBI investigated Hillary Clinton's destruction of 33,000 emails related to the Benghazi scandal. After Bill Clinton met the Attorney General on her private jet, the FBI director said he found no intent. Just before the election the FBI director reopened the case, and closed it again. Wikileaks file in Ebook Reader format. House and Senate Committee investigations. 

UPDATE:  James Comey’s irreparable reputation took another body blow this week after a memo emerged, written by the former FBI Director, appearing to exonerate Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing in relation to her handling of classified information — prior to the investigation’s conclusion. (...) National Review’s Andrew McCarthy believes Obama was the puppet master, so to speak, driving the narrative to insure Hillary was gotten off the hook, ensuring the Democrat Party continued its control over the White House. National Review reports:

Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated. This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton, as I recounted in the same column: On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute). (More)
The former FBI Director testified to Congress that he decided not to recommended charges in relation to handling of classified information, after the FBI interviewed Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016. However, a new report reveals Comey penned a memo exonerating Clinton in the Spring. (...)

On September 28th, 2016, Texas GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe asked Comey the following (simple) question: “Director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges relating to classified information before or after Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on July 2nd?” Comey’s answer under oath? “After” (...)



Sep 29, 2016 Rep. John Ratcliffe, TX to Comey: "Do You Believe ANY laws broken by Hillary Clinton/Her lawyers?"

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and fellow GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote a letter to the FBI this week, expressing concern over whether Comey made up his mind about the email investigation months before his public news conference. “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” the senators wrote. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.” (More)





Aug. 10, 2017


ED KLEIN - CONFIDENTIAL: A PLEA BARGAIN  FOR HILLARY?




Aug. 8, 2017 Ed Klein - Confidential: A Plea Bargain for Hillary?

BREAKING REPORT: DOJ Believes there are Ample Grounds for Prosecuting Hillary. Newsmax is reporting that the DOJ believes there are ample grounds to prosecute Hillary. They are also considering offering Hillary a Plea Bargain in exchange for confessing multiple crimes. If they know she is guilty of multiple crimes, why let her off the hook like this? Seems there are still one set of rules for the Clintons, another for everyone else. (Source)






Aug. 9, 2017


ED KLEIN: HILLARY OFFERED PLEA BARGAIN


In an exclusive telephone interview with Infowars.com, noted Clinton author Ed Klein affirmed the reliability of his source for the story he published yesterday that the Justice Dept. has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information on her private email system while she was secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if she were willing to plead guilty. Klein’s reporting suggests President Trump’s harsh criticism of Attorney General Sessions may have prompted the Justice Department not only to begin an investigation of criminal leaks, but also to reopen an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. “My source is the golden standard of sources,” Klein insisted. “The lawyer who is my source is closer to the Clintons than anybody.” Infowars.com asked Klein if he considered it likely Hillary Clinton would accept a Justice Department plea bargain, if one were offered. “In my view and in the view of my source, it is highly unlikely – almost zero – that Hillary Clinton being Hillary Clinton will accept – if it were offered, and it has not yet been offered – a plea bargain,” Klein answered. (More)





May 5, 2017


DEM SENATOR CALLING FOR HUMA ABEDIN PROBE


While testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, FBI Director James Comey revealed that Huma Abedin, a top aide to Hillary Clinton, forwarded thousands of emails, including classified information, to her husband, Anthony Weiner. On MSNBC on Thursday morning, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) called for a special prosecutor to investigate if Abedin committed a crime by forwarding the classified material. “If there was classified information and it was improperly passed to a person unauthorized to receive it, yes, naturally it’s a crime,” Blumenthal said. “Without knowing what the intentions were and so forth, there is potentially a prosecutable crime.” (More)






May 4, 2017

FBI DIRECTOR'S TESTIMONY STUNS SENATE COMMITTEE


The Comey testimony before the Senate Judicial Committee hearing caused some jaw dropping and utter disbelief. How can such a situation occur in a developed country that prides itself on the rule of law. It illustrates how the Obama regime was able to politicize the Justice Dept., the FBI and other branches of Government. Comey's troubles all stem from his June 5, 2016 statement in which he recitated the list of Clinton's criminal transgressions and then stopped to say, but...we can't establish intent. Translation: she was basically too incompetent to have intended anything. Then, after AG Loretta Lynch was caught talking on a plane with Bill Clinton, Comey's hand was forced for the first time. He was forced a second time into the open when thousands and thousands of Hillary emails containing classified information was found on Carlos Danger's laptop. Huma forwarded emails to him to print out for Hillary. One wonders, was there no secure printer available at the State Department? If you accept that Comey was solely responsible for fouling up Hillary's chances in the election, these must be reduced to the root, her cleansing of 33,000 emails and her illicit server in the basement of a mum and pop shop.




Historical archive