Monday, August 3, 2015

Co-Founder of Greenpeace Explains Why Climate Change is a Sham

Since time immemorial, our climate has been and will always be changing. Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace explains why 'climate change', far from being a recent human-caused disaster, is, for a myriad of complex reasons, a fact of life on Planet Earth..



Jul 27, 2015 Patrick Moore explains why “climate change”  is  a fact of life on Planet Earth. YouTube Channel Prager University. (Source)


Sen. Ted Cruz on Sunday said facts don’t support climate change, in a speech that described the notion as a front for power-hungry politicians who want to control Americans’ lives. During an appearance before some of the most influential conservative donors in the country, the Texas Republican said there is no factual basis for scientists’ research that shows the planet is changing.

The 2016 White House hopeful said none of the research is worth the paper it is printed on. “If you look at satellite data for the last 18 years, there’s been zero recorded warming,” Cruz said in California’s Orange County. “The satellite says it ain’t happening.” Instead, Cruz said, government researchers are reverse engineering data sets to falsify changes in the climate. “They’re cooking the books. They’re actually adjusting the numbers,” Cruz said. “Enron used to do their books the same way.”

Cruz said scientists four decades ago were studying “global cooling, a global ice age was coming,” and they were as wrong as those who now say the earth is warming. “Senator, you’re not saying global warming isn’t real?” interrupted his interviewer, Politico’s Mike Allen. “I’m saying that data and facts don’t support it,” Cruz said to applause from 450 donors to the political network organized by billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch.

“Full on denial?” Allen replied, making sure he was understanding the first-term Senator. Cruz was ready with his retort. “It is always disturbing to hear science use the language of theology. Deniers. Heretics. That’s not what science is supposed to be about. Science should follow the facts.” Cruz then said the notion is being used to control the economy and energy industry in the hopes of combating of climate change.

“To any power-greedy politician, this is the perfect theory. It can never, ever, ever be disproven,” Cruz said.

Above article in Time closes with this sentence that confirms the dogma with the climatist's credo: :
Science, however, does not back up Cruz’s position. Geochemist James Lawrence Powell, an adviser to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, reviewed peer-reviewed science journals and found that only two articles rejected climate change during 2013. His sample size: 10,885 articles. (Source)
Dogmatists will never comprehend that 'settled science' is a contradiction in terms. Science it skeptical, meaning that the last theory is followed by a question mark, pending a better hypothesis. Science is never 'settled' and certainly not by majority or consensus. Galileo Galilei, Roger Bacon, anyone?


Related