Most journalists today are not traders in news, but self appointed political activists selling the public a far Leftist stance for centrism. They are surprised and dismayed when no one is buying it
@Hugodixon Were journalists supportive of IS before they killed Foley?
— ★Kassandra (@Kassandra_Troy) August 23, 2014
@Hugodixon Great point. How can one possibly be understanding towards an ideology that a child understands is morally evil?
— ★Kassandra (@Kassandra_Troy) August 23, 2014
UPDATE: Sometimes the mask suddenly drops.
@Hugodixon @Kassandra_Troy I would love to cover them close up. But unwise and unlikely.
— Simon Robinson (@iron_emu) August 23, 2014
July 5, 2013
BBC Runs Puff Piece on Syrian Jihadi Cannibal
Remember this graphic gore video of 'Free Syrian Army' commander Abu Sakkar cutting out and eating the heart of a fallen Syrian soldier? Well, there's news
“I swear to God, soldiers of Bashar, you dogs – we will eat your heart and livers! Takbir! God is Great! Oh my heroes of Baba Amr, you slaughter the Alawites and take their hearts out to eat them!”
The BBC have found an angle to turn this savage desert dweller into a victim. You can't make this stuff up, but the BBC managed it! And you'll never guess whose fault it is? YOURS!
"Put yourself in my shoes": BBC runs puff piece lauding Syrian jihadi cannibal
This is how the mainstream media shapes opinion: the people they choose to present as reasonable, or whose crimes they choose to try to exculpate, are those whom they want you to support. The BBC would never, for example, run a piece this warm, positive, and anxious to be understanding about Pamela Geller or Geert Wilders or Tommy Robinson or me (and I haven't carved out anyone's heart and bitten it for at least several weeks now).
The fact that they ran this shows that they support the Syrian jihadis, and want to justify Western intervention on their side.
"Face-to-face with Abu Sakkar, Syria's 'heart-eating cannibal,'" by Paul Wood for BBC News, July 5 (thanks to all who sent this in):
It sounded like the most far-fetched propaganda claim - a Syrian rebel commander who cut out the heart of a fallen enemy soldier, and ate it before a cheering crowd of his men. The story turned out to be true in its important aspects, though when I met the commander, Abu Sakkar, in Syria last week, he seemed hazy on the details.
"I really don't remember," he says, when I ask if it was the man's heart, as reported at the time, or liver, or a piece of lung, as a doctor who saw the video said. He goes on: "I didn't bite into it. I just held it for show."
The video says otherwise. It is one of the most gruesome to emerge from Syria's civil war. In it, Abu Sakkar stands over an enemy corpse, slicing into the flesh. "It looks like you're carving him a Valentine's heart," says one of his men, raucously.
Abu Sakkar picks up a bloody handful of something and declares: "We will eat your hearts and your livers you soldiers of Bashar the dog." Then he brings his hand up to his mouth and his lips close around whatever he is holding.
At the time the video was released, in May, we rang him and he confirmed to us that he had indeed taken a ritual bite (of a piece of lung, he said). Now, meeting him face-to-face, he seems a bit more circumspect, though his anger builds when I ask why he carried out this depraved act.
"I didn't want to do this. I had to," he tells me. "We have to terrify the enemy, humiliate them, just as they do to us. Now, they won't dare be wherever Abu Sakkar is."
"And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah knows..." -- Qur'an 8:60
He is 27, a stocky, tough-looking Bedouin from the Baba Amr district of Homs, with a wild stare and skin burned a dark brown by the sun. He tells me the story of his involvement in the revolution, leading to his current notoriety. Before the uprising, he was working as a labourer in Baba Amr. He joined the demonstrations when they started in the spring of 2011. Then, he says, a woman and child were shot dead at a protest. His brother went to help. He, too, was shot and killed. In a YouTube video from June 2011, Abu Sakkar can be seen at the front of a crowd waving olive branches to greet deserting army officers. He took up arms against the regime, one of the first to join a new organisation called the Free Syrian Army (FSA).
In February 2012, he was fighting with the Farouq Brigade, and they tried, and failed, to stop the regime taking Baba Amr. When the FSA fled Baba Amr, he started his own brigade, the Omar al-Farouq. They saw bitter fighting in Qusayr.
Along the way, he lost another brother, many relatives, and countless of his men. His parents were arrested and he says the police rang him so he could hear them being beaten. "Put yourself in my shoes," he says.
"They took your father and mother and insulted them. They slaughtered your brothers, they murdered your uncle and aunt. All this happened to me. They slaughtered my neighbours."
He goes on to talk about the man whose flesh he held in his hands: "This guy had videos on his mobile. It showed him raping a mother and her two daughters. He stripped them while they begged him to stop in the name of God. Finally he slaughtered them with a knife...
What would you have done?" Well, perhaps not make a meal of my enemy, I think. At the time, Abu Sakkar's men greeted what he did with cries of "God is Great". Now the fighters looking after him while he recovers from an injury just seem a bit embarrassed.
Abu Sakkar says the dead soldier was an Alawite or Shiite militiaman. "He was insulting us. He was shouting, 'Oh Ali, Oh Hussein, Oh Haydar [Shia slogans],'" he says. "In the beginning, when we captured an Alawite fighter, we would feed him, make him feel comfortable.
We used to tell him we were brothers. But then they started raping our women, slaughtering children with knives." A man in the room interrupts to say the Alawites are not proper Muslims. This war is becoming increasingly sectarian.
Abu Sakkar shows me scars from 14 different bullet wounds on his body. "We're under siege, it's been two years now," he says. "Videos from the Shabiha [government militia] show many more terrible things than what I did. You weren't too bothered.
There wasn't much of a media fanfare. You didn't care. You suffer a fraction of what we suffered and you'll do what I did and more." He continues: "Qusayr was destroyed, Baba Amr destroyed, Homs was entirely destroyed. No-one cares. See how the refugees are living? Would you accept your parents living the same way? The Syrian people refuse to be humiliated. We are defending the Islamic nation and this is how the Arabs and the West treat us? What did the West do? Nothing."
Finally, he adds: "If we don't get help, a no-fly zone, heavy weapons, we will do worse [than I did]. You've seen nothing yet." So Abu Sakkar has become the "cannibal rebel" - a handy symbol for all those who, like the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, oppose arming the Syrian rebels.
Standing next to an uncomfortable looking David Cameron, Mr Putin told a G8 summit news conference: "These are people who don't just kill their enemies, they open up their bodies, and eat their intestines in front of the public and the cameras. Are these the people you want to… supply with weapons?"
It is possible that Abu Sakkar was mentally disturbed all along. Or perhaps the war made him this way. War damages men - and Syria is no different. As the poet W H Auden wrote: "Those to whom evil is done, do evil in return."
I asked the Free Syrian Army's chief of staff, Gen Salim Idris, why Abu Sakkar hadn't been arrested. His answer tells you a lot about the reality of how the war is being fought on the rebel side.
"We condemn what he did," said the general. "But why do our friends in the West focus on this when thousands are dying? We are a revolution not a structured army. If we were, we would have expelled Abu Sakkar.
But he commands his own battalion, which he raised with his own money. Is the West asking me now to fight Abu Sakkar and force him out of the revolution? I beg for some understanding here." Abu Sakkar seems unsure how to respond to his notoriety.
He is, by turns, sheepish, nervous, angry and bitter. He definitely has the look of a man who has seen too many bad things. At the end of our interview he says he is an "angel of death" coming to cash in the souls of the enemy....
- "Hating Breitbart" the Movie Released Today
- The Incestuous Obama-Media Nexus
- Are the Media Revolting Against Obama Intimidation?
Politeia Articles Archive